all things fan girl

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

The Gunstringer: Proving Kinect May Not Be Useless After All

Posted on 15:56 by jackson

Crossposted and commissioned by Gaming Blend



Earlier this week marked the release of The Gunstringer, the first Kinect title from studio Twisted Pixel. The Austin-based company was looking to create a game that went past the casual nature of most Kinect titles and appeal more to the core players. As someone who has generally been unimpressed with how games have been using this motion technology, I was curious to see if one could actually break out of the box and hold my interest longer than five minutes. So did it? Let's break it down.

The basic concept of The Gunstringer is that we are participating in a puppet show starring the titular marionette with no name. The game opens following a woman into Austin's Paramount Theater as she takes her seat in a packed audience. The camera takes us back stage, where we see the actual, wooden puppet and follow it and its puppeteer through the hustle and bustle of opening night, and up on to the stage for the start of the game. From then on, there are occasional cuts to reaction shots of the audience to remind us where we are and provide a bit of comedy. Some have complained that this reminder completely takes them out of the game, but it didn't bother me in the slightest.

This charming concept lends itself extremely well to the Kinect because of how it figures in to gameplay. You use your left hand as if you were holding a marionette, lifting it to make the Gunstringer jump and moving it from side to side to make the Gunstringer, well, move from side to side. You use your right hand to engage in combat, whether it be with a gun, sword, flame thrower or fist. Knowing that you are "controlling a puppet" makes the idea of holding your hands out for 4 hours much more tolerable. The mere fact that logic is backing up the gameplay goes a loooong way.

Full review after the jump



The tale being played out in this puppet show you are controlling is one of the classic Western variety. The Gunstringer used to be a part of a posse. The posse betrayed him. Now he is taking his revenge, going after them one by one. This is divided into a prologue, four "plays", each with four "acts" and a boss battle, and an epilogue. Each "play" has a different theme - the Old West (posse villain = big oil baron), the New Orleans Bayou (posse villain = brothel madam), the East (posse villain = elderly ninja), and the Land of the Dead (posse villain = voodoo priestess). Each section takes roughly 45 minutes, but be warned, 45 minutes is a long time to continuously move your right arm in what can only be referred to as a "shooting motion". I had Gunstringer elbow after a mere hour. To continue, I had to both enlist the help of someone else for co-op play *and* throw an ice pack on my elbow. Note: I'm a healthy, fit 25 year old. Effing Kinect.

Even though the mimed act of shooting a gun can get painful, it was my favorite mechanic of the game. You move your hand over a total of six targets at a time, then pull your arm back, as if to fire, then you watch all six targets go down in one fell swoop. You really feel the force behind the shots you take. Which is why it was a damn shame when the physical act of doing it began to hurt too much to go on. I highly recommend taking your time with this game, as with *any* Kinect title. Elbow fatigue is infinitely more unpleasant than thumb fatigue.

Luckily, a Player Two came to the rescue. The co-op in this game is an interesting cat, equal parts necessary and pointless, exciting and boring. This is because the only function player two can serve is to assist in shooting. This is great on the one hand, because shooting is hands down the most fun aspect of the game, and not having to worry about moving around and dodging boulders, trees, bombs, sheep, walls, spikes, death (seriously, why the hell is there so much crap to dodge constantly), all you have to focus on is aiming and shooting. But this is simultaneously bad because it means when *anything* else is going on, such as punching (the focus of a few "acts") or the endless levels that involve nothing but jumping and dodging, player two just stands around, bored. But, as I said earlier, my elbow simply said no at a certain point, so having someone to focus on the shooting while I just worried about the Gunstringer's movement was essential to my enjoyment of the game. And as long as your player one stays the same, you can switch different friends in and out as player two.

Normally, one of my main frustrations with Kinect games is how inaccurate they can be, being either way too sensitive to movement, or not able to pick up on movement nearly fast enough. But the game engine for The Gunstringer all but eliminated that concern. Sure, once or twice the undead cowboy didn't jump when I lifted my hand, but for the most part, he did exactly what I wanted him to. Pro tip: When dodging things aiming to kill you, keep an eye on the wooden control handle where the Gunstringer's strings come from, as opposed to keeping an eye on the Gunstringer himself. Focusing on the location of the handle will help you navigate more smoothly.

Unfortunately, no amount of precise movement could help the "jump and dodge" levels from feeling repetitive and shoehorned in to an otherwise fluidly fun game. These frustrating levels seem like they only exist because they feature something the Kinect can do, as opposed to providing a fresh new angle to the story or gameplay. The variations I *did* enjoy were when the act of "pulling the trigger" was eliminated and you simply held your hand over what you wanted to shoot while the Gunstringer fired madly away, and the more classic arcade style of play, where you didn't have to worry about movement at all, as the screen moved for you, and you only had to wait for enemies to pop up so you could shoot them down.

But aside from certain frustrating elements (And to be honest, the "jump and dodge" element to video games always bothers me. Let me shoot something, come on.) and my Gunstringer elbow, the gameplay was a huge step up for Kinect. I felt in control, I felt powerful, and I felt the need to keep coming back, to see if I could do better.

One of my favorite elements to the game was the ever important (especially for any game that bridges on the redundant) death-not-meaning-you-must-replay. If you die, you simply select continue and pick up right where you left off. You lose all your points from that level as punishment, but that is a punishment I would GLADLY take over having to replay a level I didn't get through the first time. I have mentioned how much I hate jumping and dodging, right? I was very grateful for this element - many points to the game developers for knowing not to push their luck. They also get points for allowing the shooting of civilians to be counted toward your score, not against it. Just a side note.

The story and elements were surprisingly strong as well. Narrated by voice actor R. Bruce Elliot in an exaggerated Western style, The Gunstringer struck me as the perfect gaming companion piece to the surreal animated film Rango, another subversive 2011 spin on Western tropes. The humor in The Gunstringer is exceedingly bizarre, some of it way off the mark, some of it chuckle-worthy (at one point a bilboard within the game reads "All your land are belong to us"), all of it in weirdo territory. Some of this is explained when all of a sudden quotes from Troma's Lloyd Kaufman start popping up. Soon thereafter, it becomes very clear that these game developers have a soft spot for Troma (an entire subplot of the Bayou level involves a lumberjack-alligator love child), but just how much of an influence Troma had on this project would give away something I'd like you to discover for yourselves.

The design too, is top notch. Since this world is one of a puppet on stage, the other characters and items are created to look handmade as well, with stuffed enemies, cattle made of beer cans, push pins, paper dolls, card board cut outs and more. And every so often a hand comes down from the sky to manipulate something on the screen, either helping or hurting the Gunstringer in his journey. He becomes increasingly aware of this mysterious hand, which leads to a fantastically meta ending that must be seen to be believed. It had our whole participating group laughing out loud. The ending alone is almost worth the entire price of the game.

Additionally, The Gunstringer is rather fleshed out for a Kinect title. I'm not used to multiple menus and options, 50 potential achievements, DLC, "Hardcore Mode" and more. There are even optional commentary tracks you can unlock if you play enough of the game, that you can choose to listen to as you replay levels.

Overall, The Gunstringer is easily one of the most original, seamless and entertaining uses of the Kinect technology to date. The whole thing only took a few hours to play, in which 34 achievements were unlocked fairly naturally (leaving 16 slightly more challenging ones to go back and conquer if I ever felt the need) and I had a pretty damn good time doing it. Throw in the free DLC and code for Fruit Ninja, and it's not a bad buy. If you own a Kinect, here's your chance to own a game you may actually play. Fingers crossed other studios developing games for Kinect step it up the way Twisted Pixel has. Lionhead and Fable: The Journey, I'm looking at you. Don't let me down.

Players: 1-2
Platform(s): Xbox 360
Developer: Twisted Pixel Games
Publisher: Microsoft Game Studios
ESRB: Teen
Rating: B+
Read More
Posted in Game Review, gunstringer, Kinect, Reviews, Video Games, Xbox | No comments

Monday, 19 September 2011

The Highs and Lows of The 2011 Emmys

Posted on 02:23 by jackson

Another Emmys telecast has come and gone, once again filled with awkward presenters, repeat awards, an okay opening musical number, some emotional acceptance speeches and an inexplicable amount of promotion for Two and a Half Men.

Wait. One of those things is not like other.


Anyway.

Here are the highs and lows.

High
Jane Lynch
Aside from one bit that went completely over my head (see below. way below.), host Jane Lynch nailed every single joke during the Emmys telecast. Favorites in particular included her "gay agenda," exchange with the Mad Men group during the opening, and intro to the men of Entourage. Her musical number wasn't aces, but that wasn't her fault. Never offensive (which I don't actually mind, but still it was nice to not have that Awards-show-cringey-feeling for once) always hilarious, she was a fantastic pick.

Low
Lea Michele
Meanwhile, a very different Glee actress didn't nail any joke, not the ones written for her, not her improvised one, nothing. To make things even more awkward, co-presenter Ian Somerhalder seemed pissed to be paired with her and when the teleprompted joke about actresses being divas came up, I know I was not the only one half expecting the camera to zoom in on Lea Michele herself. It certainly would have the saved the bit to have a moment of self effacing truth. What, being honest about yourself is good enough for Paula Abdul and Charlie Sheen, but not Lea Michele?


High
Lonely Island
It was utterly absurd and nothing about it was not fun. Plus, they freaked Bill Macy. Bill Macy! Love it.


Low
The Emmytones
I feel AWFUL saying this because individually, all six of these actors (Zachary Levi, Cobie Smulders, Taraji P Hensen, Kate Flanney, Wilder Valmerema nd Joel McHale) are wonderful (Okay not Wilder Valderama so much), but together, they created a bit of a train wreck. Not because anyone did a bad job per se, but rather because the bit was completely unnecessary. It added nothing except for a few chuckles thanks to Cobie Smulder's facial expressions after LL Cool J popped in to rap. Jeff Winger would so not approve.

High
Comedians Presenting
The Jimmys wrastling, Sofia Vergara having fun with her accent, Melissa McCarthy & Amy Poehler bringing it as usual, and Hugh Laurie making dry material work prove that when you want people to bring the funny, you should ask the funny people. (Yes, Hugh Laurie is on House now, but you guys, Blackadder.)

Low
Anyone Else Presenting
Or at least you know, if they don't know how to be funny, don't force them to try, okay? There is nothing worse than seeing someone crashing and burning on live television. Okay, there are lots of things worse than that, but still. There was way too much awkwardness on stage tonight. Poor Anna Torv not knowing how to react to David Boreanez going off script, Kerry Washington looking like she was about to die if someone didn't give her a sandwich....I know you'll get this presenter thing right one day, Emmys. One day.

More after the jump!




High
Actress in a Comedy
Perfection. Great idea, impeccable execution, and to top it off, a genuinely surprising and meaningful ending with Melissa McCarthy pulling an upset over favorite to win, Laura Linney. I vaguely recall there being a bit in this category last year and can only hope these ladies keep up the trend.

High
Emmy Winner Fun Facts
I enjoyed these last year and tonight was no exception. No matter how true or false the commentary might be, it's always entertaining and provides a nice filler as the winners make their way to the stage. Granted, this guy was nowhere near as good as the Hogdman, but enjoyable nonetheless. Or maybe I just liked it compared to -

Low
Network Announcer Lady
Okay seriously, who wrote this shit? "Will Friday Night Lights stop Dexter on its way to Emmy stardom?" Huh? What does that even mean? Or how about when she proposed that the Best Actor in a Comedy race was only between Jim Parsons and Steve Carrell? That one might even be worse because it was kind of true. Can she just say what is coming next without getting into the ridiculous and kind of offensive area of "this race is between only two entities"? I get bothered by weird things.

High
"The Office" Spoof
I always enjoy bits that feature people in character and this was one that did it in style. Featuring various characters from all over the TV-verse talking about their jobs, the highlight involved Aaron Paul making a visit to Dunder-Mifflin to drop off some meth to resident weirdo, Creed. How is he so brilliant even in a 45 second comedy bit?!

Low
Jersey Bit
Forgive me, actually don't, cause it''s not a crime, but I've never seen an episode of anything referenced in this episode, except for like, Boardwalk Empire. But Jersey Shore? Jersey Wives? Jerseylicious? Jersey Jersey Jersey what what? No. I don't have time for that shit. I mean, yes, the point of this bit was to make fun of the abundance of Jersey-centric shows, but still, I'd rather we just pretended they didn't exist.


High
Friday Night Lights Love
I've somehow still never watched this show, but I have enough friends whose opinions I trust that LOVE this show and were THRILLED with the awards it won, to appreciate the long awaited acknowledgment of this beloved drama. I was definitely upset that Jon Hamm didn't get his much deserved Emmy (The Suitcase! Come on, people!), but apparently Kyle Chandler is long overdue as well and this really was his last chance, so it's all good with me.


High
Mad Men's Fourth Win
Yes. I'm serious. Mad Men's fourth season was its best so far, and since it won Best Drama seasons 1-3, how would it not winning for its best season yet make any sense at all? I know people were upset that Friday Night Lights didn't pull it out for its last season, but honestly, when a show as universally ignored as Friday Night Lights even gets *nominated*, and not only that, but wins Best Actor and Writing? That's enough to be happy about. I sat through zip zero nothing for Buffy, Gilmore Girls and Battlestar Galactica and I'm still waiting on one effing nomination for Fringe, guys, so I can only be SO sympathetic. As for Game of Thrones, while it reached unmatched levels of amazingness at the end of its first season, the first half was all exposition. Now is not the time for Game of Thrones to win best show, but that time will come at some point, no doubt. Mad Men season four was bridging on perfection and NOBODY should be begruging it the win.

Low
Jim Parsons' Second Win
Not that he isn't fantastic. He is. Really. You guys shouldn't hate on this show as much as you do. But this was Steve Carrell's last chance for years of top notch work that reached its peak in his last season on The Office. The disappointment filled the whole room and was felt even by Parsons himself, which just made the whole award a bit of a downer.


High
Sofia Vergara
There's like, not much more to say on the matter. She just manifests a "high" in every way possible.

Low
Katie Holmes
The opposite of Sofia Vergara

High
Ed O'Neill To The Rescue!
Margo Martindale almost took a spill before delivering one of the most heartfelt, wonderful speeches of the night, but luckily, superhero Ed O'Neill was sitting nearby and lept to her rescue.

Low
Mixing Variety and Reality
I don't want to see The Daily Show mixed it with The Real Housewives of wherever the fuck. I really don't.


High
Peter Dinklage
DDIINNKKLLAAAGGEEE!! LANNISSSTTEEERRR!!!! You know what I'm saying? Plus, his speech was humble and sweet. Has anyone ever rattled off the names of his fellow nominees with that much confidence, that much ease? He's a fuckin pro. And he thanked his dog sister. His DOG SITTER. Only cool people do that. As a frequent sitter of other people's animals, I was a big fan of this choice.

High
Montages
I LOVE CLIPS. MOAAAAR CLIPS!


Low
Montage Omissions
No Fringe. Seriously? Like, are you serious, The Emmys? This isn't a joke? Fringe is the best Science Fiction show on television. And it's on FOX. The network AIRING THE EMMYS. I was gonna let It's Always Sunny not being included in the Comedy montage pass, sure, even though it's weird, (FX OWNED BY FOX PS,) but bypassing Fringe is nothing but unacceptable. If you are gonna go out of your way to make montages based on genre, but not specific to what's nominated, you should really try to include some of the shows that have been majorly overlooked, you stupids.

Best
The Path To EGOT
Tonight, we were reminded that with her second Emmy, Maggie Smith just needs a Grammy (anyone know a book she should record herself reading?) and with her first Emmy, Kate Winslet just needs a Tony (this shouldn't be that difficult to pull off, can it?). Justin Timberlake and Gwenyth Paltrow also got closer with their guest star wins, but if Justin Timberlake ever becomes an EGOT, I'll ram my head into my wall. But overall, a good Emmys for potential EGOTs.

Low
All Two And A Half Men All The Time!
Why was this damn show being promoted so damn much during the Emmys?! Barely a mention of Fringe but Two and Half Men gets like four dedicated bits?! Really?!

That about does it for me. A perfectly fine show with a few great moments that has successfully gotten me jazzed for this season of television to begin. Especially Fringe. Yeah, that's right, by ignoring Fringe, you just made me think of Fringe all night. So if that was the plan, Fox, then good work, but I don't think you're that smart. Anyway. Moral of the story: Watch Fringe. Not Two and a Half Men.
Read More
Posted in Awards, emmys, Television | No comments

Leave Christina Hendrick's Breasts Alone: A Rant

Posted on 00:58 by jackson



Just happened to catch part of the local news just now doing a "wrap-up" on Emmy's fashion. I say wrap-up with quotes because no one appearing on the local news knows shit about shit, I've decided, based on this segment at least.

The woman who will henceforth known as Skinny Bitch Guest Correspondent had the audacity to place Christina Hendricks in the Worst Dressed category, not because the dress was ugly, not because the dress didn't fit her, not because she looked bad, but because she had too much cleavage. Seem like a reasonable criticism? Well, clearly you don't have large breasts or understand the mechanics of large breasts.

I get the criticism that some dresses may be in poor taste like the one Gwenyth Paltrow wore that one time. I don't need to tell you which dress I'm referring to, because we all remember it. It was a little trashy and had a lot of nip. I also get criticisms about, you know, a dress looking like a plastic cup with a bunch of holes in it like Juliana Margulies' was tonight, sure, yes, when your job is to critique fashion, I get shit like that.

But Christina Hendricks looked stunning. Yes, she had a lot of cleavage. But NEWSFLASH, SKINNY BITCH GUEST CORRESPONDENT, CHRISTINA HENDRICKS HAS CLEAVAGE BECAUSE CHRISTINA HENDRICKS HAS BOOBS. BREASTS. SHE HAS THEM. SHE HAS ACTUAL BREASTS OF AN ACTUAL LARGE SIZE. SHE POSSESSES LARGE BREASTS. DO I NEED TO EXPLAIN THIS AGAIN? HER BREASTS ARE HUGE.

For those of you still asking "But why does she need to have cleavage?", allow me to explain a little something to you. When you are born with large breasts, like I was, like Christina Hendricks was, like countless women are, the only way to NOT have cleavage is to cover them up completely. Is to wear a boatneck or turtleneck. Are you trying to say that because I am a D cup, I am forbidden from wearing a dress or shirt with a v neck?

A couple years ago, I got some shit from a male employer for "showing too much cleavage" at work. Was I wearing low cut tops? No. Sure, some were lower cut than others I wore, I guess, I own a lot of shirts. But I wasn't trying to be provocative. I wasn't trying to look sexy. I was wearing clothes. Clothes just like anyone else in the office. But because my breasts happened to be large, it was "distracting" and from then on, I had to make a point of trying to own more uncomfortably high necked shirts. Needless to say, he wasn't my boss for long.

But even if I understand having to dress extra conservatively for the workplace, this isn't going to the office. This is going to the Emmys. This is dressing to the nines to celebrate your hard work and the hard work of everyone else in your field. When you work in television, this is your party of the year, your time to go all out and look amazing. And you, Skinny Bitch Guest Correspondent, is saying that Christina Hendricks should have thought about how distracting her NATURALLY LARGE BREASTS BECAUSE SHE HAS NATURALLY LARGE BREASTS CAN I BE ANY CLEARER ABOUT THAT are and dressed more conservatively? Really? Julie Bowen and Heather Morris waere practically not wearing a front to their dresses, but oh, they're really skinny, so it's okay.

It's hard enough for me to find dresses that work with D breasts, let alone whatever Hendricks is sporting. Add to that her gorgeous slightly fuller figure than most Hollywood designers are regrettably not used to designing for, and you get someone who probably has a hard time finding the perfect thing to wear for these kinds of events. The size 0/A cup women she is surrounded by can more or less get away with wearing any sort of design they want. Hendricks has a harder time mostly because she needs major support for her chest. Her options are limited.

When you look at Hendricks' dress, it is in fact gorgeous and incredibly tasteful. As far as necklines go at this sort of thing, the dress isn't even *that* low cut. The only way for Hendricks to not have cleavage is to dress as she does on the show, and on her special night out, I think she should have the freedom to, you know, not dress like she is a secretary in a repressed 1962 environment. If *any* other woman had worn that dress, there would be no complaints.

It really bothers me that if Hendricks looks up anything relating to "fashion police" she will see one article after another (E! and AOL are guilty as well. EW thankfully understands what women are) saying she "needs to try a new look instead of this same old silhouette." or "it was just too much." To me, it sounds like a bunch of women intimidated by the confidence of a truly feminine woman, unafraid of her body, even if it doesn't fit the stupid mold the media wants it to fit and they want to make Christina feel bad about it and stop showing off her god-given assets, which she happens to pull off by doing nothing but wearing a pretty dress. Fuck em, Christina. Your breasts are beautiful, your body is beautiful, and you should wear whatever makes you comfortable and happy.

Oh, and be sure to head here for @eruditechick's thoughts on the matter, as well as some awesome photographic evidence
Read More
Posted in christina hendricks, emmys, Fashion, Mad Men, Rant | No comments

Thursday, 15 September 2011

cARTel's Everybody Nose Working Actors in NY

Posted on 06:24 by jackson

Fearful of clowns? Or just plain annoyed by them? Me too. But I think it's time we stopped being so prejudice against such a misunderstood group (because they're not all John Wayne Gacy, Jr.). That's why this Friday night I'm seeing Everybody Nose Working Actors in NY, a show about a group of clowns trying to make it big in New York City.

cARTel, a LA based theatre company, is premiering their clown troupe in New York this Friday and Saturday. The show is an extension of the troupe's clown workshop, where actors create and develop their own miming clown persona. Set against the backdrop of a Broadway audition, this weekend's show will feature some brand new New York clowns. So come join me as we work together to get over our unnecessary fear and annoyance, by seeing cARTel's Everybody Nose Working Actors in NY.

Everybody Nose Working Actors in NY
September 16th & 17th, 9 PM
Yoga Agora
33-02 Broadway
2nd Floor
Queens, NY 11106
$7 presale, $10 at the door
(very limited seating, buy your tickets in advance)
Read More
Posted in cARTel, clowns, New York, Theater | No comments

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

On The Scene: Raiders of the Lost Ark 30th Anniversary

Posted on 09:00 by jackson
Cross-posted on Film.com

One of my all time favorite movies and probably one of yours too, Raiders of the Lost Ark, screened in downtown Los Angeles last night to celebrate its 30th anniversary. I have an interesting past with Indiana Jones - in elementary school I watched Temple of Doom constantly, without even realizing, despite having seen them as a child, that there were other films in the series (blame TBS or its early 90s equivalent). Then shortly after graduating college, I finally experienced Raiders for the first time for real, on a big screen, at a theater my friend managed, where roughly ten of us watched, drank and yelled things at the screen like "Life magazine is for Nazis."

But last night was my first experience watching any Indiana Jones film with a packed crowd. It was my first experience with an audience laughing when I laughed, gasping when I gasped, and hiding their eyes in anticipation of what is to come right along with me. Watching the stunning print (being prepped for Blu-Ray release - more on that below) with an audience filled with fans, including those of the famous variety like Simon Pegg, Edgar Wright, Damon Lindelof, and minor characters from both Glee and Cougar Town (no, really), felt like a gift in many ways. And if the screening alone wasn't enough, on hand to discuss the film in a post-screening Q&A were Steven Spielberg and surprise guest Harrison Ford. Never before had the two talked about Raiders together in front of an audience, and we could tell it was as special for them to be doing this as it was for us to be witnessing it.

Geoff Boucher of the LA Times, the man responsible for the event, introduced Spielberg by going through a long list of his best films (sadly omitted? Two of my modern favorites, Catch Me If You Can and Minority Report), reminding us, as if re-watching Raiders of the Lost Ark didn't already, what a genius the man is that we were about to hear speak. What followed was a wonderful 45 minutes, filled with honestly, surprises, old stories, new stories and insightful thoughts on film and its industry. To find out how the infamous swordsman scene came to be, what the friendship between Spielberg and George Lucas is like, how Spielberg feels about Lucas changing Star Wars for Blu-Ray, Spielberg's favorite Indy films, details on the blu-rays for both Indy and ET, and a whole lot more, read on. Full transcript below.

On the beautiful print we had just watched,

Steven Spielberg: This is the best it's ever looked because in preparation for the eventual release on Blu-Ray (applause), we had to go and correct the print again and get the original negative out of the salt mines (laughter) and then we had to do the separations and basically, the files which were just amazing with all the technology today, without changing any of the movie materially, like we haven't removed anything (applause) we haven't added CGI...This is the movie that some of you may remember from 1981, looking at the age of the audience, most of you don't remember it from 1981 (laughter). But it is THE movie, it just looks so much better.

On the difference between Steven Spielberg before Raiders compared to after,

SS: Well before Raiders I needed a job because I just made 1941 and no one would hire me (laughter). Except George Lucas, my friend. So yeah, I needed the eggs, you know? And this was sort of right up my alley because I had been a tremendous fan of the B Movie Republic serials and certainly so was George Lucas, so when, you know, it's an old story, but maybe bears repeating, that I was in Hawaii with George cause he was terrified of the opening of Star Wars so he called me and said, do you want to go to Hawaii with me and we'll sit there and just build a lucky sand castle cause you know, Star Wars was about to open, this was May of 1977. It opened and it was a huge success. In those days you knew it was going to be a success when all the 10am shows were sold out and they were, across the entire nation, and George came back, more relieved than I had ever seen him and started planning his next opus and he brought me this concept he had to me called Raiders of the Lost Ark about this intrepid sort of gravedigger archeologist going after somewhat paranormal antiquities from all over the world and he did not have the story...but he had the genre, he had had the idea and the homage it would be to the B Republic material. Right away I was intrigued and we made this deal...to make this movie.

On his friendship (described as "best friends") with George Lucas,

SS: George doesn't do text or email ever, I've never received a text or email from George and he's never received one from me. He's a phoner you know, it's all over the telephone or it's in person. So it's either eyes on or it's a telephone call, but it's never texting...You know, you get a phone call and it's like here, (Spielberg slips into George Lucas impression) "Hey Steve. (laughter) What are you doing?" "Oh I'm just sort of sitting around working George, making ten pictures a year as a producer, what are you doing?" "Oh. I don't know." (laughter)...The thing with George, when George and I get on the telephone, I have to clear my morning or my afternoon because we talk for a long long time. The only person I've ever talked to at the length I talk to George, believe it or not, was Stanley Kubrick, back when we were friends in the 80s, but George, you know, we talk about everything, we talk about movies, his projects, my projects, we talk about our families and our friendship and it's an enduring friendship. I met George when he premiered THX at the Royce Hall UCLA/USC Film Festival in 1967 I think it was, so we've known each other for a long time.

Geoff Boucher: Do you ever talk about another Indiana Jones movie? (one audience member says WOO!)

SS: One person! One person wants to see another Indiana Jones movie. (laughter) The ONLY person in the audience

GB: It was Shia! (laughter)

SS: No, I think that was the only bridge we didn't burn because of Indy 4. We talk about it, yes. And we're hoping, we're hopeful. (lots of applause this time!)

More, including Harrison Ford making a surprise appearance, after the jump




GB: I've heard so many different versions of how [the swordsman shot by Indy's gun] scene got into this movie. Could you clarify for us, exactly how that happened?

SS: Okay, well, the truth is, that the morning we were supposed to shoot this three page long sword vs whip fight between the swordsman and Indy, and Harrison came to me in the morning and he said, he always called me "Pal", he said "Listen Pal, (laughter), I went into like, Señor Barfies and I had something that didn't agree with me last night and you've got about an hour with me and then I'm going back to the hotel cause I'm really sick, so what do you wanna do?" And I think I said, "Well we have a few pages to shoot, but if you pull out your gun and kill the swordsman, you can go back to the hotel."

(Over the mic, a voice from the distance) No, no (audience starts going nuts. Out walks Harrison Ford. Standing O commences.)

Harrison Ford: That was an approximation. (laughter). What happened was that I was -

GB: Harrison Ford, by the way (laughter and applause)


HF: I had chosen to eat the native food unlike Steven who went to Tunisia with a steamer trunk full of spaghetteos (laughter) and I had suffered mightily for my - for that. And I was no longer capable of staying out of my trailer for really more than it took to expose a roll of film, which was ten minutes (laughter) and then I would have to flee back there for some, uh, sanitary (laughter) facilities. It was really horrible and we had rehearsed the night before what was to be a three day scene. There was a certain logic to my plea the next morning. It was a bout a forty five minute to an hour drive from our hotel to the set and during that period of time, it came to me that there might be a way out of this (laughter) and it came out of the logic, you know, an interest in the film, we had just shot a lengthy scene in which their was a duel between the uh, the bad guys with swords and things -

SS: - (is amused) bad guys!

HF: - the bad guys, and the whip and we were about to shoot another scene that would take us at least three days to shoot and the ultimate, the sad thing is that the guy who was playing the black swordsman had won the part, probably the greatest contest for any part in the film was over this because Steven and George were convinced that you could throw a salami in the air and slice it into wafer thin slices, so this guy had trained and trained and trained and we had to tell him that he was going to die. (laughter) My logic was that we really didn't want to see another [fight]...we wanted to get to Marion who was captured, so I said 'Hey Pal, why don't we just shoot the sonofabitch?" And Steven said "I was just thinking that." (laughter) And that's all there is to it. But the poor guy. When the news was broken to him that he was not going to get the chance to show any of the skills he had spent the last three months acquiring with a sword...

SS: Yeah, but he became the most famous swordsman ever to die by Indy's gun

HF: The first time I shot him, it took about three weeks for him to die, because he had been robbed of the drama, that was his due, so he did a very elaborate death scene -

SS: First he dropped the sword, then he stumbled backward, then he came forward again, ...started to weave, and then ... he stood there on his knees and went face down. That was take one.

HF: Yeah. And then I said to Steven, "Steven, watch this".. and before he had the chance to say action, I pulled the trigger and he went (impression of what the swordsman does in the film), and fell down, and that's what's in the movie.

GB: So Tunisia was a rough time for you guys?

SS: I never got sick there because I ate the...canned food - spaghetteos, pork and beans...I just packed a steamers trunk of food because I had heard that you get a little bit of indigestion there and you needed to take care of yourself, so Doug Slocombe, the DP, and I were the only ones who didn't get sick over a 6 month shooting period.

On Doug, the DP

SS: Well Dougie, now, he's still with us, but he's like 101

GB: 98

SS: 98. Woah. ... And Dougie was older then and I had really loved Dougie's work in a number of movies he made.Oone was the movie Julia, I loved his work in that and he was just a supreme camera man and what I liked about him was he wasn't afraid to use fill light, and I wanted this movie to look like an old fashioned Hollywood Saturday matinee movie, which meant instead of having a lot of abstract, Noirish lighting, where it's really bright on one side and really dark on the other, I wanted the faces to be seen, and I didn't want someone to flatly light the movie, I wanted somebody to know how to give it an elegant style, you know, let me see the faces but also the use the sun, use back light, the characters needed to stand out from the background. He already came to the party with that style and he was kind of known for that and I cast him for that reason. And Dougie was amazing, he was, if I wanted to put the camera up on a small mountain and I said lets get the camera up there, I'd tun around and ten minutes later, Dougie was halfway up the mountain already, ahead of the cameraman, ahead of the dolly grip, ahead of the focus pull, ahead of everybody. And he was just this rugged, yet funny individual, he told me a story one day and this is sort of the quintessential Dougie Slocombe, he said he had a few pints at the local pub one night and he had divorced his first wife or she had divorced him about 20 years before, and he was a little tipsy and got home and he took his keys out of his pocket and he started to look for his key and found the right key and put it in the lock and it wouldn't go, he went to the second key and it worked, and he opened the door, he went upstairs, and there was wife of 20 years ago, in bed with her husband of 20 years and he had gone to the wrong house (laughter). That was just Dougie! He was the absent minded director of photography.

HF: Dougie never used a light meter. He would just read the density of the shadow by the shadow of his thumb against his palm and he would give a light reading to the cameraman with that method

SS: He also stuttered, and it was kind of a beautiful stutter because his gaffer's name was Martin and of course it was hard for him to pronounce Martin... The M was difficult for him and then it would always be "Martin, umumum 11 5." and he was always right. Or he would look around and say "Martin umum um 5 6. "and then we'd move out of the shadow - "8 11" - and he was just spot on. I never worked with a DP before or since that didnt use a light meter.

On getting cast as Indiana Jones,

HF: I got a call from George Lucas saying that he wanted me to meet Steven Spielberg and that he was sending a a script over that he wanted me to read in preparation for that and I read the script and thought it was an incredible opportunity and about two hours later, I was at Steven's house talking about it. And of course it was because, oh whats his name, um, uh, um, Tom. Selleck? Tom? Tom? Tom had to drop out, Tom Selleck, because of an overlying commitment to do Magnum PI, so I hadnt heard the name Indiana Jones until about four hours before I had the part.

SS: What happened was after Tom [had to drop out]...,George asked me to come up north to see a cut of Empire Striesk Back...when it was over I walked over to George and said "We have our Indiana Jones" and he said, "Who?" and I said "That guy, Han Solo, that's Indiana Jones", and George said "Well yeah hes a great actor, but you know, but he's identified now with this characer in Star Wars" and I was like "Yes, but he's an actor, he can be identified with other characters as well!" (laughter) and George had never thought about Harrison in that context but he immediately, at that point he said yeah... and said it would be great amd he called Harrison a couple days later.

On revisiting the character of Indy,

HF: Maybe a fifth. But I ain't going to Mars. (loud applause and cheers)

SS: Well I ain't going to Mars with you

HF: What was the question?.. (laughter) It's an absolute delight to revisit this character and the chance to work with Steven again, who only hires me for Indiana Jones. I'm an actor, you know? (lots of applause and laugher). I guess I have to wait for Tom Hanks to take a series. (lots of laughter)

TH: You know who I offered Jurassic Park to? This guy. Alan Grant. First offer to Harrison.

HF: ...It was a lot like going to Mars

SS: What really scared Harrison was I had the art department, and I still have the patining, the art department made a paintg of Alan Grant and the kids Lex and Tim in each hand running toward camera with a huge T-Rex chasing after them and i told him to put Harrison's face on the character, I think that night have done the trick

HF: Next time we get a script for Indy, I would be delighted to play the character again. We both had an ambition for the character and the series.... each time we meet Indiana Jones, we have an occasion to... we wanted to advance the audience's understanding of, and experience with, the character not just by putting him into adventures, but by learning something new about him, something about what made him what he is and that led to meeting his father in the person of Sean Connery and his son in the person of Shia and bringing back Karen all for those things, which are to me what makes the character so interesting.

Boucher starts to talk about Spielberg's upcoming projects and points out Simon Pegg in the audience

SS: Hey Simon! Now I forgot, were you the twin with the P or without the P? All right, and Nick Frost is the other one.

On Raiders' link to Tin Tin,

GB: You hadn't really heard of Tin Tin til Raiders was released, is that right?

SS: I hadn't heard of Tin Tin at all, when Raiders came out, my assistant came over and said French newspapers ...kept mentioning Indiana Jones in reference to Tin Tin and .... Indiana Jones spelled out and next to it, Tin Tin, all over the place. [I got it] translated and it said Indiana Jones owed a lot to Tin Tin and so I got my hands on a book which was not easy to get in 1981 in the United States, but I got book and I could see that there were a lot of similarities, adventure stories especially the globetrotting aspect, but thought they were different enough that they could both coexist in the same world at the same time , so I tried to get the rights to Tin Tin back in 1983, when I was directing Harrison in London on temple of doom and I had the chance to talk to Herge and he invited me to Belgium and we had the chance to talk about making a movie out of his work and sadly he died a few weeks later but I was invited back about a moth later by his family....so this movie has spent what, almost 30 years in the planing stages.

On the making of Raiders,

HF: It was arduous, but I was young and dumb (laughter) and I really enjoyed it. And the thing about the action that I think was original was that we had the notion to show Indiana Jones' fear in a way that hadn't been often expressed before and so we got the opportunity to complicate that a bit with character, I thought that was interesting. But it was fun to do, it was arduous and it became more arduous as the years went on, I don't think I made it through one of the movies without a major injury. I was run over by the flying wing in this one and tore an ACL in the middle of Tunisia, and in the second one I shut the whole movie down for about a month and a half while I got my back operated on.

On Indy's fear,

SS: That was Harrison's contribution, his approach to the whole character wasn't something I was going to do with the movie, and that was to let this hero be afraid i thought he was going to be this great movie idol, this great movie hero, with many iconic possibilities, but Harrison said "if you want the audience to believe that I'm real and not just some guy in a cape, you better let me show that I'm afraid and I'll recover from it okay but I need to show that fear." Harrison brought that entire tapestry to the entire part. That transformed the movie for me.

Boucher then brought up the controversy surrounding George Lucas changing Star Wars - cue audience groan - and asked if Spielberg feels the need to go back and change things,

SS: That's a little hot topic, isn't it? (laughter) Let me put it this way. George does what he does cause there is only one George Lucas and thank god for that. He's the greatest person I've ever worked with as a filmmaker and collaborator, he is a conceptual genius, he puts together these amazing stories and he is great at what he does. And my feeling is he can do whatever he wants with his movies because those are his movies. We wouldn't have been raised with Star Wars or Indiana Jones had it not been for George, so what he does with his films is great. Speaking for myself, you know, I tried this once and I lived to regret it. Not because of fan outrage, but simply because I was disappointed in myself. I was overly sensitive to some of the criticism ET got from parent groups when it was first released in '82 having to do with Eliot saying "Penis Breath" or the guns...and then there were certain brilliant, but rough around the edges close ups of ET that I always felt, if technology ever evolves to the point where I can do some facial enhancement for ET, I'd like to. So I did an ET pass for like the third release of the movie and it was okay for a while, but then I realized that what I had done was I had robbed the people who loved ET of their memories of ET. And I regretted that. (massive applause) And the only contrition that I could possibly do because I felt bad about that was, the only contrition that I really performed was when ET came out on DVD for the first time, I asked Universal, I didn't ask Universal, I said you're gonna do this, when you release this on DVD you have to come out for the same price of one DVD, you have to put two movies in the box and one movie will be the 1982 version and the other will be the digitally enhanced version. I'd like to ask you this, let's do a little poll here, cause I know we're coming out with the blu-ray of ET, if I just came out with one ET on blu-ray, 1982, would anyone object to that? (loud NO from the audience). Okay then, so be it. (huge applause)

Boucher points out that they should do a 30th anniversary screening of ET next year - there is wild applause in response

The questioning then turned to Ford. Boucher noted the last time they saw each other was at Cowboys and Aliens (which received healthy applause from the audience, much to my surprise), pointed out Damon Lindelof in the audience, then asked Ford to elaborate on what he said on set, which is that he finds that most films heavy on the digital don't have a soul.

HF: Well, what I think I was struggling to talk about properly was, the potential that filmmakers have with computer created graphics is wonderful and can be wonderfully creative, but it can also lead to a failure to attend to a human scale, to go so far beyond our experience and our imaginations as an audience, to remind us that we are watching a digital effect, rather than some subtle extension of our experience, which makes us feel like it's humanly possible and this leads to a vast field of computer created images as far as thee I can see and beyond, you know, against one or two humans, and this kind of potential I think often robs movies of a degree of soul. (applause) However. (laughter) That's just me.

SS: No, I think it's a tool. The digital tools available to all of us are simply that, tools, and we either make a movie that celebrates digital era or we throw away story for a bunch of crazy wonderful special effects that keep us entertained but don't give us anything to remember beyond the fact that we spent two hours watching all of these special effects, or we could continue to write good stories, original stories, real strong narratives where the digital components are simply going to if not enhance the experience, create another way to have an experience. Like, I couldn't have made Jurassic Park that anyone would have believed in this audience, even back in 1993, you wouldn't have believed that movie if the dinosaurs were stop motion animation or clay-mation, you wouldn't have believed it. That was a digital tool. That was the first movie ever to use digital technology to create an entire character, as a matter of fact, a whole bunch of characters in the animals. So there's a time and place for it. In The Abyss, that digital tool where Mary Elisabeth Mastrantonio, her face is on the end of that water snake, was awesome it was phenomenal, we hadn't seen anything like it before, and that stands out when it's used because the story needs it to be used at that exact moment. It's when everything is just a special effect that we start to lose our way. (applause)

On Tin Tin making Spielberg feel like a painter more than ever,

SS: Well only because I could do it over and over again til I liked it, so I could get it right. Usually with a live action movie, we take the shot...the shots tell a story, you get involved, you look at it it makes you laugh it makes you think, gets you excited, in this case we do the same thing, but we can perfect it, we can actually bring it to a point of tremendous satisfaction without any extra cost...and you get it where it's right, so I had the chance to affect color, I was able to help light the movie, I certainly collaborated on all my live action films with all my DPs, but on this one I really got to light the picture, decide what time of day or night the scene took place in...and I did it quietly and privately, I didn't have 200 people waiting around me to make a decision, I could do it just with a couple of animators...between New Zealand and Los Angeles and it was a really intimate experience.

Then the Twitter questions began. Someone from the LA Times brought out the card with questions to give to Geoff, but it was comically intercepted by Spielberg who looked at the card and said "Who won the Republican debate?" then passed it to Harrison Ford who looked at it and said "Michelle Bachmann? Really?" It was an improvised bit that didn't perhaps make a ton of sense (why would the answer be on the card too?) but was delightful nonetheless and the audience loved it.

On a date for the Raiders Blu-Ray,

SS: We don't know. Soon. It's true that we don't know when soon is. Soon in my world would be about six months, soon in George's world is later than six months, but probably, I don't know, cause he's coming out with Star Wars first and then after that he's going to position Raiders, we're just not sure if it's gonna be Raiders, Temple of Doom and The Last Crusade , 1 -2 -3 separately or if they're all gonna be together, they haven't decided yet.

On what is harder and what is easier about making movies now compared to thirty years ago,

HF: Well, you know there's been a lot of changes in the business. Maybe the hardest thing is - you know, I was very lucky to come up in the hey-day of the movie business, it was a very lucky time, when more people went to the movies than ever, when show business was a good business to be in. That's less the case now, so it's hard to see a film that might find an audience or be a success ten years ago go down the drain now because the audience is so fragmented and because [of the business climate]. There are [fewer] chances being taken in some cases, there's less diversity in movie projects...

On how they feel about film today,

SS: I look at today as much more diverse than ever before in history, there's more independent film being made now than ever before, you got filmmakers, older filmmakers, artists coming out of different mediums that are able to make pictures, that are able to make You Tube movies, that are able to make movies for limited release on shoestring budgets and they have film festivals and small, kind of niche studios that are willing to make these pictures, so there's much more of a vocal presence, there's a tremendous variety in the kind of movies being made today. By that same token, when I was making pictures in the 70s and 80s, the directors made all the decisions about the genres and what films they wanted to make. Today it seems the studios are in control of the genres and what kind of films *they* want to make and they go out and they hire the directors that they think would be appropriate....Back in the 80s, 70s, the big studios relied on the filmmakers to have all the answers and today, big studios I think presume to have all the answers... I'm [at a] film studio right now, I don't presume to have all the answers, but I know what it feels like to think maybe once in a while that I do, and it sort of undercuts the filmmakers you really depend on to bring good stories to you. But I think it's always going to be a writer/director initiated medium, and it's always going to be carried home by the actors.

HF: That's what I meant (uproarious laughter and applause)

The Twitter question "What are you most excited about?" is met with hilarious silence from the guests

SS: Well you know, right here, talking to Harrison, we haven't done this before, this is amazing talking about - you know we haven't talked about this movie together in front of people before, this is a first for me, so that would be my answer

GB: (To Ford) I guess you gotta say the same thing now, don't you?

HF: (pause) Yeah. (pause) (pause) (laughter) (pause)

GB: This is from Todd (laughter), this is him speaking, I think Raiders is as close to perfect as a movie gets, (applause), is there anything in it you wish you could change?

SS: No, nothing, of all the movies I've ever made, this is maybe the only movie that I can actually bear watching from beginning to end and watch it like an audience, not like someone who knows what's coming next. I can get lost watching Raiders of the Lost Ark. And I also get lost watching Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, those are my two favorite of the four movies. I can't say that about every movie I've made, but this movie was very special to me in that way. (applause)

More on making Raiders,

SS: I was coming off of an extravaganza called 1941...it was really a long picture. And I made everything up on 1941 as it went along...it was an out of control production, completely because of me, and George and I sat down and George gave a big sort of big brother lecture to me and he said to me "I know you can do it, go back to your tv movie days...and I'll bet you anything, you need this movie Raiders to bring you back to a kind of responsible form" And he was right, he was right, so I storyboarded the hell out of this picture, I storyboarded every scene, I storyboarded scenes when it was just two heads talking to each other that had nothing else going on. And we made a documentary on the making of this movie...and there's a scene which is so typical of Harrison's relationship with me during the whole shoot, but I was so excited every morning to show Harrison the storyboards, I would walk him through his day, so I'd be there with my big book open of storyboards, and I would be explaining what's gonna happen next, we would do this, then Harrison said "Excuse me" and he gets up and he walks away, (laughter) ... and he doesn't come back, so you know...he didn't always listen, but I had the storyboards, so we finished the movie 14 days ahead of schedule because of those damn storyboards. (applause).

HF: Steven was very fast, very fluid, it was effortless to make the film. He was wonderfully open and collaborative and generous and it was really a fantastic experience. (applause)

And with that the men said their goodbyes and headed back stage, not before Spielberg took the time to sign an Indy poster for a fan in the front row though. Overall, a wonderful, insightful, exciting evening in celebration of one of the best movies of all time turning 30. And be sure to keep an eye on this website for video highlights from the evening - some of the moments between Ford and Spielberg cannot truly be captured in mere text.
Read More
Posted in Event, geoff boucher, Harrison Ford, Indiana Jones, LA Times, raiders of the lost ark, Screenings, steven spielberg | No comments

Friday, 9 September 2011

Fringe Encore!

Posted on 05:47 by jackson

The New York City Fringe Festival's Encore Series starts today and runs through the 26th. During this time, you can catch a selection of some of the best shows from the Festival, including the winner of the FringeNYC Overall Excellence Award The More Loving One.

The More Loving One was one of the five ATFG recommended shows and we're thrilled that this amazing production received the Festival's top honor this year! A fantastically written and acted show, The More Loving One is a dark comedy about two relationships that are thrown off kilter after a scandalous sex trail. An honest, intimate, and moving portrayal of the difficulties of love and committed relationships, the play explores how just one argument can bring a slew of hidden thoughts and feelings to the surface.



Buy your tickets to this excellent show here.

What:
The More Loving One

When:
Sunday, September 11th @ 7:30pm
Wednesday, September 14th @ 9:00pm
Tuesday, September 20th @ 8:00pm
Thursday, September 22nd @ 9:30pm
Monday, September 26th @ 8:00pm

Where:
The SoHo Playhouse
15 Vandam Street
New York, NY 10013
Read More
Posted in Fringe Festival, New York, Theater | No comments

Friday, 2 September 2011

September at the Movies

Posted on 09:00 by jackson

Cross-posted on and commissioned by Film.com

Yikes, August. YIKES. Surprising me at every turn (except Conan and 30 Minutes or Less. Sort of predicted those), August has turned into quite the bizarre month. With everything from genre films to comedies to 3D experiments bombing left and right, August is seeming like the worst time to release a movie about anything other then, what, evolution? One following the evolution of apes, the other of civil rights? Does it come down to "great reviews or bust?" And will September fare any better, as the shift away from Genre film and towards Drama begins? Let's take a look.

Looking for thrills, chills or loud noises?

Shark Night 3D (Sept 2)
The inevitably silly horror movie (not a bad thing) that tried winning over fans with a mechanical shark at July's Comic-Con, boasts a who's who of "Oh, that guy/girl! She/he was on that CW show!" in its cast, but unfortunately also comes with a PG-13 rating. How inappropriate can it really get without a hard R?

Am I Seeing It? I'd like to, but I wanted to see Pirahna 3D too and that sure as hell never happened. So. Probably not.

Contagion (Sept 9)
The latest from Steven Soderbergh, the trailers for which I have been avoiding like the plague (pun not intended, I swear), that stars just about everyone ever. Don't believe me? Matt Damon, Marion Cotillard, Bryan Cranston, Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Winslet, Jude Law, Lawrence Fishburne, Jennifer Ehle, John Hawkes, Sanaa Lathan, Elliot Gould and Demetri Martin. It's like New Years Eve, but about the end of the world [Insert joke about Lea Michele starring in a movie being just as apocolyptic]! Or about something else, I don't know, like I said, I'm avoiding the trailers and synopses. In any event, I suspect it shall be awesome.

Am I Seeing It? Yes. Opening weekend if possible.

Straw Dogs (Sept 16)
A remake of the beloved 1971 thriller directed by Sam Peckinpah, with James Marsden in the Dustin Hoffman role, that also stars Kate Bosworth, Alexander Skarsgard and Walton Goggins. Okay, I'm sure Goggins has a small role, but I love him, so yeah, he gets fourth billing, damnit. No one thinks this remake was necessary, but there's always at least a small chance that it's good, right? So far the reviews I've heard range from "terrible" to "well-acted and intense", so who knows. The only thing I can guarantee is that Skarsgard makes everything better.

Am I seeing it? Let's be real. No.

Abduction (Sept 23)
Taylor Lautner isn't who he thinks he is, so busts some shit up and other crap. I honestly could not care less.

Am I seeing it? What do you think?

Killer Elite (Sept 23)
Jason Statham versus Clive Owen, who is holding Robert De Niro captive. Assassins! Guns! And for you Chuck fans out there, Yvonne Strahovski as a bonus!

Am I seeing it?
Considering I haven't yet seen a single Jason Statham movie, I think not. Gotta keep this trend going, it's too bizarre a bragging point. (I've seen Snatch, but that's not a Jason Statham "joint", you know?)

Dream House (Sept 30)
Yes, it's the movie where Daniel Craig and Rachel Weitz met & fell in love, but no, it's not a romance. Craig and Weitz play a couple who move into a new home, only to discover something terrible happened to the previous residents. I won't say anymore than that, and unless you want to be spoiled, you won't look for more details. You ESPECIALLY will not watch the stupid spoilery trailer.

Am I seeing it?
I was going to until the whole movie got spoiled for me in the trailer. So. No.

Looking for something a bit more on the dramatic side?

The Debt (Sept 2)
A nazi espionage thriller that takes place in the 60s and 90s, starring Helen Mirren, Tom Wilkenson, and Ciaran Hinds, as well as Jessica Chastain, Martin Csokas and Sam Worthington as their younger selves. I've heard rather good things, and I always likes me some spies and intrigue and Helen Mirren.

Am I seeing it? Yes, though not right away

Moneyball (Sept 23)
Brad Pitt. Jonah Hill, Philip Seymour Hoffman and most importantly - Baseball! Its September release worries me as it definitely has certain implications when you start talking Oscar (i.e. the film may not quite good enough), but I'm still looking forward to it.

Am I seeing it? Yessss!

Machine Gun Preacher (Sept 23)
Not, I repeat NOT anything close to a Grindhouse film, despite what the title may lead you to believe. It's in fact the true story of a former drug dealer who found religion and fought to save Sudanese children from their unfortunate fate, starring Gerard Butler and directed by Marc Forster.

Am I seeing it? If I need to? For awards purposes? But it looks pretty not at all up my alley and kind of terrible. Gerard Butler being dramatic weirds me out.

50/50 (Sept 30)
Movies about someone who is dying are really hot and cold for me, as so often they seem to simply be a cheap plot device (I'm looking at you, Love and Other Drugs),  but this one has Joseph Gordon Levitt in it, is much more of a dramedy than drama, and some people whose opinions generally line up with mine are loving it.

Am I seeing it? Yes. In theaters, even if not opening weekend.

Take Shelter (Sept 30)
A must see if you're trying to see all 87 of Jessica Chastain's 2011 releases. Here, she plays wife to the brilliant Michael Shannon, who is having apocalyptic visions of an incoming storm and starts secretly building a shelter to protect them, before realizing that it may be him, not the storm, that warrants his family's concern. Won the International Critics Prize at Cannes

Will I be seeing it? Based on what I'm hearing about Michael Shannon's performance alone, yes

Looking to (maybe) laugh?

Bucky Larson: Born To Be A Star (Sept 9)
Two porn stars make an ugly son and the ugly son becomes a porn star. AUUGHH THIS SOUNDS LIKE A NIGHTMARE

Am I seeing it? Absolutely not

I Don't Know How She Does It (Sept 16)
Sarah Jessica Parker and Olivia Munn! What a duo! But Busy Philips is in there too and I love her. Anyway. There is a plot. Sort of. SJP plays a financial executive who also has a family and omg, I don't know how she does it! Get it? Does that count as a plot? But the screenplay is by Aline Brosh McKenna, who also brought us The Devil Wears Prada, 27 Dresses and Morning Glory, so as pointless as the film sounds, I'll probably like it anyway. And Christina Hendricks being in it doesn't hurt. But you can always get your Hendricks fix from Drive..... :)

Am I seeing it? In theaters? I mean, I did see Something Borrowed and 27 Dresses and Leap Year and Valentine's Day in theaters....but probably not. DVD/TBS however? Heeeeeellls yes.

What's Your Number (Sept 30)
A cute concept and a great cast with a script written by sitcom vets leads me to believe this Anna Faris comedy about a girl looking back on the last twenty men she's had relationships with, could actually be pretty great. And is it totally shallow to think Chris Evans looks exceptionally wonderful in the trailer?

Am I seeing it? Does "opening weekend" expose my love for romantic comedies too readily?

Looking to bring the kids?

Lion King 3D (Sept 16)
It's LION KING!!! RE-RELEASED!!! Who cares how you feel about 3D, it's effing Lion King! I watched the first four minutes in 3D at D23 and cried. Cried. Four minutes. I can't wait.

Am I seeing it? At the El Capitan and everything.

Dolphin Tale (Sept 23)
I don't even know what this is and you're making me look it up. Why? Why are you doing this? It's not even animated! It stars Harry Connick Jr as a doctor named Clay and a dolphin as a dolphin. Stop it.

Am I seeing it? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no

Looking to discover something?

Apollo 18 (Sept 2)
Found footage in SPACE!! The reason why we never went back to the Moon, ooooh. I thought I was hearing great stuff for some reason, but it turns out it is supposedly awful. Yikes.

Am I seeing it? Not after hearing the universally horrible reviews

Warrior (Sept 9)
Movies.com favorite David Ehrlich described this film to me as "OH MY GOD TOM HARDY'S MUSCLES ARE EATING HIS BODY AND THREATENING TO BECOME A GLOBAL CONTAGION" and frankly, that's all I need to know. I'm sold.

Am I seeing it? Yup! Although perhaps not in theaters. There's only so many hours in the day.

Restless (Sept 16)
This new film from Gus Van Sant was poorly received at Cannes, but the premise is interesting enough. Mia Wasikowska plays a terminally ill girl who falls for a boy who likes going to funerals and is friends with the ghost of a Japanese kamikaze pilot.

Am I seeing it? Maybe. The bad reviews disappoint me, but the trailer still gets me. Seems like my kind of joint.

Tucker and Dale vs Evil (Sept 30)
The small horror comedy that made a splash at Comic-Con during the At the Drive In Panel, it stars Alan Tudyk and Tyler Rabine as two hilbillies who get attacked by a band of preppy school kids while on vacation at their mountain cabin. The film is supposed to be bananas amazing and I can't wait. It's actually on VOD right now, but I say wait it out and give it some much deserved love in theaters if you can.

Am I seeing it? Absolutely. Opening weekend.

Looking for something unlike anything else?

Drive (Sept 16)
Just go see it. Don't ask questions. Don't look anything up. It stars Ryan Gosling and Carey Mulligan and is unlike anything you've seen before. Maybe you'll like it, maybe you won't, but I loved it and did I mention Albert Brooks plays the heavy and Ron Pearlman steals every scene he's in? Dooooo itttt.

Am I seeing it? Already did. Add it to your list immediately.
Read More
Posted in Movies | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The Definitive Differences Between Tintin and Rin Tin Tin
    Cross-posted on and commissioned by Film.com Image: alittlewhitenoise.com With   The Adventures of Tintin   opening this week, I keep encoun...
  • The Most Notable Comic-Con Panels Of All Time
    Full post on Film.com edited by @davidehrlich With Comic-Con only days away, we decided to take a little look back to put the giant event in...
  • Back To The Future Timeline Infographic
    If it's Back to the Future related, and I see it, it's getting posted.  [ Slashfilm ]
  • AFI Fest Wrap Up: The Movies I Can't Stop Thinking About
    Although the line up we caught at this year’s AFI Fest presented by Audi didn’t quite match up with the stellar picks from last year, the 20...
  • Obligatory Lost Quote of the Week
    "Imagine something is about to happen, something catastrophic, and the only way to stop it from happening was by releasing a huge amoun...
  • Vote For Outdoor Cinema Food Fest's Fall Movies!
    The Outdoor Cinema Food Fest is letting us vote for which movies we want to see in the fall, along with which movie we want to see on Hallow...
  • OHMYGOD I NEED 8 MILLION DOLLARS STAT [WANT]
    okayokayokayokayokayokay, so there is gonna be a Lost prop auction and I DONT THINK I'VE EVER BEEN SO EXCITED TO SPEND MONEY I mean, I...
  • Best Finds of Wondercon 2012
    As per tradition, here is our wrap up of the best finds on the Wondercon floor. As a Dealer's Room junkie, I always like seeing what I m...
  • CinemaCon '12: Martin Scorsese and Ang Lee Talk 3D & The Future of Cinema
    Perhaps my favorite part of CinemaCon 2012 was the Filmmaker's Luncheon, which featured an in depth talk with Martin Scorsese and Ang Le...
  • JULIAN + ANDY = OMG
    The best video I've seen in ever:

Categories

  • 24
  • 30 Rock
  • 500 days of summer
  • 50s Movies
  • 90210
  • A Capella
  • abduction
  • Absent Mothers
  • Access Theater
  • acting
  • Action
  • Activision
  • Actors
  • Adania Shibli
  • adornment
  • Ads
  • Adventure
  • AFI Fest
  • Ahimsa Collective
  • alcatraz
  • Alcohol
  • Alice in Wonderland
  • All Things Fangirl
  • Alphabet
  • American Idiot
  • American Idol
  • american reunion
  • Anaheim
  • AND OH MY GOD ADULT SIZED KEN TAGS.
  • Angel
  • Animals
  • Animation
  • Apple
  • Archer
  • arkham city
  • Art
  • art parties
  • Arts and Crafts
  • Assassins Creed: Brotherhood
  • Atari
  • Auctions
  • Audition
  • avatar: the last airbender
  • Avett Brothers
  • awake
  • Awards
  • Awesome
  • Back to the Future
  • Backstage
  • Bad Robot
  • badass
  • Barbie
  • Barbies
  • basara samurai heroes
  • Batman
  • Battlestar Galactica
  • Best Of
  • bill and ted
  • bionic commando reArmed2
  • Bioshock
  • bioware
  • Blogging
  • blu ray
  • Blu-Ray
  • Blunderbuss
  • Board Games
  • Boardwalk Empire
  • Bob Dylan
  • Bon Iver
  • Books
  • Bored To Death
  • boredom
  • Boston Film Festival
  • Bottle Blondes
  • Boys
  • Brad Pitt
  • Brecht
  • Brian Selznick
  • British
  • britney spears
  • Broadway
  • Brooke Berman
  • Brooklyn
  • Buffy
  • cabin in the woods
  • Caitlin Burns
  • CalArts
  • Caleb Followill
  • Capcon
  • Captain Blood
  • Captain Planet
  • Cards
  • cARTel
  • Cartoons
  • Casting Call
  • Catwoman
  • Caucasian Chalk Circle
  • Celebrities
  • Characters
  • Charity
  • Choir
  • Chris Evans
  • chris miller
  • Chris Nolan
  • christina hendricks
  • Christopher Nolan
  • Chuck
  • Classic Movies
  • clint eastwood
  • Clips
  • Clock Root Books
  • clone high
  • clone high usa
  • Clothing
  • clowns
  • Coachella
  • Cocktails
  • Cold Hearted Snake
  • Collectables
  • Colossus
  • Comedy
  • Comic Con
  • comic-con
  • comic-con 2011
  • Comics
  • Community
  • concerts
  • Contest
  • Conventions
  • Conversation
  • Cooper Union
  • Costume
  • covers
  • Crashbox Theater Company
  • Crazy 4 Cult
  • Crushes of the Week
  • cult movies
  • Cyclops
  • d23
  • Damon Daunno
  • Daniel Faraday
  • david fincher
  • Dawson's Creek
  • DC
  • DC Comics
  • dead rising 2
  • Deadpool
  • Death
  • Debate
  • Desmond
  • Despicable Me
  • Dharma Initiative
  • Dinosaurs
  • Discussion
  • disney
  • disneyland
  • Doctor Who
  • documentaries
  • Dogs
  • Dolls
  • Dominic Monaghan
  • dont you dare sell out of this before I get there
  • Download
  • downton abbey
  • Dr. Horrible
  • dr. who
  • dragon age
  • Dream On
  • Dreams
  • Drinks
  • driven to drink
  • DVDs
  • E3
  • Earl Lovelace
  • Earth
  • Easter Eggs
  • Ebay
  • Edgar Wright
  • Edward Gorey
  • Eminem
  • Emma Frost
  • Emma Watson
  • emmys
  • England
  • Entertainment Earth
  • Entertainment Weekly
  • episode 2
  • Errol Flynn
  • eruditechick
  • Etsy
  • Etsy Geek Search Of The Day
  • Event
  • event write up
  • events
  • extreme makeover: home edition
  • Fable 2
  • Fable 3
  • Fan Outreach
  • Fangirl Awards
  • Fangirls
  • Fantasy
  • Fashion
  • Fat Kids On Fire
  • Feminist Press
  • film festivals
  • Film.com
  • Finn
  • finnick odair
  • Fiona Apple
  • Firefly
  • Florence + the Machine
  • Food
  • Foodie
  • Fringe
  • Fringe Festival
  • funk
  • Furniture
  • G4
  • Gallery 1988
  • game of thrones
  • Game Review
  • gamers
  • Games
  • Gary Oldman
  • Geek Girl Con
  • Geekgasm
  • Geeks
  • Genius
  • geoff boucher
  • Ghost Recon
  • ghost trick
  • Gifts
  • Gil Zabarsky
  • gingerbread
  • girl gamers
  • girl power
  • Girls
  • Giveaways
  • Glee
  • Glee Cap
  • Glee Live
  • Glee-cap
  • Gleecap
  • Gleek
  • Golden Globes
  • Good Movie Alert
  • Gorillaz
  • Gossip Girl
  • Grammy Awards
  • Graphic Novels
  • great hera
  • Green Day
  • Green Lantern
  • Gremlins
  • griff the invisible
  • Grilled Cheesus
  • Guest Blogger Alert
  • gunstringer
  • Haden Blackman
  • Halloween
  • Hamlet
  • Hanna
  • Harley Quinn
  • Harmonix
  • Harrison Ford
  • Harry Potter
  • Harry Shum Jr.
  • Haymarket Books
  • HBO
  • Hellwalk
  • Henry Cavill
  • Hero Complex
  • High School
  • HitRecord.Org
  • Holiday
  • Home Decor
  • Homeward Bound
  • Horror
  • house of lies
  • How To Succeed in Business Without Really Trying
  • Hugo
  • hunger games
  • Inception
  • Indiana Jones
  • infographics
  • Inglorious Basterds
  • insidious
  • Internet
  • Interpol
  • Interview
  • Invisible Plane
  • iPad
  • Iron Man 2
  • Jack White
  • Jackie Earle Haley
  • Jake Gyllenhaal
  • James Hance
  • jason reitman
  • Jason Schwartzman
  • Jason Segal
  • Jeffrey Dean Morgan
  • Jeffrey Eugenides
  • Jennifer Egan
  • jennifer lawrence
  • Jim Dooley
  • Jimmy Kimmel
  • JJ Abrams
  • john stamos
  • Jonah Hill
  • Jonathan Safran Foer
  • Joseph Gordon Levitt
  • Josh Tate
  • Joshua Jackson
  • Joss Whedon
  • Journey
  • Joy Harjo
  • Judgement Day
  • Julian Casablancas
  • Jurassic Park
  • Karmetik Machine Orchestra
  • Katee Sackhoff
  • Ken
  • Kevin Pereira
  • Kevin Smith
  • Kick Ass
  • kickstarter
  • kid with a bike
  • Kids
  • Kids Movies
  • Kill Shakespeare
  • Kinect
  • Kings of Leon
  • Kristen Stewart
  • Kronos Quartet
  • La Roux
  • LA Times
  • lacma
  • Lacy Demon Clothes
  • Lady Gaga
  • Leaving Brittney Alone with sharp objects
  • leetup
  • Leighton Meester
  • Lesser America
  • Lionhead
  • List
  • literature
  • Live Blogging
  • live read
  • LivingSocial
  • lord of the rings
  • Los Angeles
  • Lost
  • Lucas Arts
  • m. ward
  • M.I.A.
  • MAC
  • Machete
  • Macs
  • Mad Men
  • Magical Lasso
  • Make up
  • Making Money by being a fan.
  • Making-Of
  • Margaret Atwood
  • Marjane Satrapi
  • mark ruffalo
  • Marketing Campaign
  • Marvel
  • Marvel BS Capcom
  • mary sue
  • masks
  • Media
  • mega man
  • Megamind
  • Megan Fox
  • melissa leo
  • Mercedes
  • Merchandise
  • metric
  • Mia Farrow
  • Michelle Rodriguez
  • michelle williams
  • Microsoft
  • Midnight in Paris
  • Mirror's Edge
  • Mod
  • monsters inc
  • monsters university
  • Morrison Hotel Gallery
  • Mother Jones
  • motherhood
  • Mothers
  • Movies
  • Movies for women
  • Mr. Schuester
  • MSN
  • MTV
  • multimedia
  • Mumford and Sons
  • Muppets
  • Muse
  • Music
  • Music Video
  • Musicals
  • Na'vi
  • Nathan Barr
  • Nathan Fillion
  • Necco Wafers
  • Neil Patrick Harris
  • nerds
  • Never Seen Lost
  • New York
  • New York Comic Con
  • New York Times
  • Nicolas Cage
  • Nightmare on Elm Street
  • Nintendo
  • Noir
  • Norton
  • not hating glee this week.
  • novels
  • NPH
  • NYU
  • Obsessions
  • OH MY LORD THIS IS JUST TERRIBLE
  • okami den
  • Once
  • opinion
  • Oscars
  • Pacey
  • Pacey-Con
  • Paley Center
  • paleyfest
  • Panel
  • Parody
  • Parties
  • PEN
  • PEN American Center
  • PEN Festival
  • People Get Ready
  • phil lord
  • Photo of the Day
  • Photography
  • Pipeline Theatre Company
  • pirates
  • Pixar
  • Playstation
  • poems
  • poetry
  • Point/Counterpoint
  • Poison Ivy
  • Poker Face
  • politics
  • Poll
  • Pop Culture
  • Portal
  • Powerpuff Girls
  • Predictions
  • Prince of Persia
  • prince zuko
  • Props
  • Prospect Park Bandshell
  • Prototype
  • Psychopaths
  • publishers
  • Puck
  • Puckasaurus
  • Pushing Daisies
  • Quentin Tarantino
  • Quinn
  • Quinn rocks
  • Rachel
  • Rachel Berry
  • Radical Entertainment
  • Radiohead
  • raiders of the lost ark
  • ramble
  • Rant
  • Reality TV
  • Recap
  • Red
  • Red Dead Redemption
  • Red Elevator Productions
  • Regina Spektor
  • Regionals
  • Religion
  • Retcon Fail
  • Review
  • Reviews
  • rian johnson
  • Rihanna
  • rin tin tin
  • Ringtone
  • Robert Ma
  • Robert Pattinson
  • Robert Rodriguez
  • Rock Band
  • Rock Band 3
  • Roger Ma
  • Rolling Stone
  • Rolling Stones
  • Romance
  • Roomsies
  • RPG
  • Runaways
  • Russia
  • ryan kwanten
  • Saccran
  • Salman Rushdie
  • San Diego
  • Santa Barbara Film Festival
  • Saturn Awards
  • Schedule
  • Sci Fi
  • Score
  • Scott Pilgrim
  • Scream
  • Screenings
  • SDCC
  • Season 2
  • Series Finale
  • set your dvr
  • seth green
  • Shahrnush Parsipur
  • Shakespeare
  • Shakespeare Forum
  • Shane Bauer
  • Shattered Dimension
  • Shaun of the Dead
  • Shaylyn Hamm
  • she and him
  • Shirt of the Day
  • shoes
  • Shorts
  • Showtime
  • Siege
  • Simon Pegg
  • Singing
  • Slashfilm
  • Sleep No More
  • Slings and Arrows
  • smash
  • snark
  • Soap
  • Soap Operas
  • Someone Who'll Watch Over Me
  • Something Borrowed
  • Song Suggestions
  • Sorcerer's Apprentice
  • Spaced
  • Spider-Man
  • Spies
  • Spirituality
  • Splice
  • spoilers
  • Springfield Punx
  • stamos
  • Stan Lee
  • Star Trek
  • Star Wars
  • stephanie meyer
  • steven spielberg
  • Still Alive
  • Streamy Awards
  • Street Fighter
  • Studios
  • Sucker Punch
  • Sufjan Stevens
  • summer in the city
  • super 8
  • Super Hero Squad
  • Superheroes
  • Supernatural
  • Surprise
  • sushi slippers
  • Swag
  • Swords
  • syfy
  • T-Shirts
  • Talia al-Ghul
  • taylor lautner
  • Team Fortress 2
  • Technology
  • teefury
  • Tekken
  • Television
  • Tennessee Williams
  • TERRIBLE PEOPLE
  • TERRIBLE THINGS
  • the adventures of tintin
  • The Ashgirl
  • The Avengers
  • The Beatles
  • The Big Bang Theory
  • The Big Lebowski
  • The Joker
  • the king's speech
  • The Liddy Plays
  • The Lonely Island
  • The Losers
  • The Mystery of Girls' Media
  • the river
  • The Sigh
  • The Simpsons
  • the social network
  • The Strokes
  • The Thrilling Adventure Hour
  • The Walking Dead
  • The Zombie Combat Manual
  • Theater
  • Theatricality
  • ThinkGeek
  • Thinkhero
  • Tim Burton
  • Timberlake Wertenbaker
  • Tina Fey
  • tintin
  • Tom Clancy
  • Tom Hanks
  • tom hiddleston
  • top ten
  • topher grace
  • Toys
  • Trailers
  • Transformers
  • Trilogies
  • Tron
  • Tru Blood
  • True Blood
  • TTLLTOT
  • tv
  • TV Tropes
  • Twilight
  • twilight zone
  • Twisted Metal
  • Twitter
  • User-Generated Content
  • V
  • valentine's day
  • Valve
  • vampire diaries
  • Vampires
  • Video Game Facts
  • Video Games
  • Video Games Games
  • Villains
  • Virals
  • visual art
  • Want
  • Warner Brothers
  • Warren Robinett
  • web series
  • Webisodes
  • weird science
  • westerns
  • wet hot american summer
  • Wheelchair sex
  • Wilco
  • Will Farrell
  • Wolverine
  • Women
  • wonder woman
  • WonderCon
  • Wonderwall
  • Woody Allen
  • WTF
  • x files
  • X-Men
  • Xbox
  • xoxogg
  • yacht party
  • Youtube
  • Zach Galligan
  • Zigabid
  • Zoe Saldana
  • Zombies
  • zooey deschanel

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2014 (2)
    • ▼  March (1)
      • SXSW Take Two!
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2013 (30)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2012 (89)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2011 (138)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2010 (240)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (40)
    • ►  April (49)
    • ►  March (15)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

jackson
View my complete profile